JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 24, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Manuel Armando Maldonado Mojica Vs. Iss

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Santander, Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Y El Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito De Bucaramanga. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito De Bucaramanga
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia Entre Autoridades De Diferentes Jurisdicciones
  • Competencia de la Corte Constitucional para decidir el conflicto de competencia
Conflicto De Competencia
  • Criterios funcional y orgánico reservan a la Corte Constitucional su conocimiento cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
  • Interposición de nueva tutela por hechos nuevos y no de incidente de desacato
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento de la acción de tutela entre autoridades judiciales de jurisdicciones distintas y que carecen de superior jerárquico común
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. UNICO: REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por el Manuel Armando Maldonado Mojica contra el Instituto de Seguro Social, al Juzgado
  2. Primero. Penal del Circuito de Bucaramanga, para adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  3. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.